![gay porm comic tumblr gay porm comic tumblr](https://imgix.elitedaily.com/elite-daily/2017/05/08074315/comic-book-iceman-romeo.jpg)
Instead, they’re digital spaces that are actively curating a community by creating terms of service and deciding how to deliver and prioritize content. “No one has a vested right to force a platform to allow her to contribute to or consume social media content.” The court also determines that “social media platforms aren’t ‘dumb pipes’” - in other words, they’re not common carriers. “Platforms are private enterprises, not governmental (or even quasi-governmental) entities,” declares Newsom’s opinion.
![gay porm comic tumblr gay porm comic tumblr](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/JE8RzvXwRBEdE0rMKO2UWNDOUfo=/0x96:550x384/fit-in/1200x630/cdn3.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8699467/detail__23_.jpg)
The ruling, delivered by Circuit Judge Kevin Newsom, disagrees. Florida’s defense of the law characterizes web platforms as quasi-governmental public spaces or “common carriers” akin to a phone company, making their moderation calls (in its line of reasoning) ineligible for First Amendment protection. The Eleventh Circuit ruling focuses on whether Florida’s law - which heavily restricts suspensions, fact-checking, and content removal involving political candidates and media enterprises - plausibly violates the First Amendment. It directly contradicts a recent ruling over Texas’ similar moderation ban, setting up a split that the Supreme Court could step in to resolve. Today, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld most of an earlier court order blocking Florida’s SB 7072 while a lawsuit proceeds. A US appeals court says Florida’s ban on much social media moderation likely violates the First Amendment, setting up a legal showdown over social networks’ speech rights.